When it comes to the Autumn Budget, Reeves faces two broad paths, each with distinct consequences for investors:
1. Pro-growth
In the run up to the Budget, pressure on the Chancellor has intensified as data showed muted growth in August following a contraction in July. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said gross domestic product (GDP) rose by just 0.1% month on month in August after falling by 0.1% in July. The ONS added that in the three months to August, GDP grew by 0.3%, compared with 0.2% in the three months to July1, which is not a sign of strong momentum.
Announcing tax cuts could be the answer but it won’t be the solution to all the Chancellor’s challenges. However, equity markets may benefit. Corporate tax cuts could provide a boost by increasing net profits and supporting higher equity valuations. But while fiscal stimulus through tax reductions might spur growth, it also risks fuelling demand-driven inflation, particularly if personal tax cuts give households more disposable income. Stronger consumer demand could push prices higher and force the BoE to raise interest rates again.
Additional government spending could also stimulate economic activity, especially in infrastructure and industrial sectors. The problem lies in how bond markets would react. Increased borrowing typically leads to higher gilt (UK government bond) yields as investors demand greater compensation for inflation risk and more debt. Rising yields increase borrowing costs and can negatively impact equity valuations, a dynamic seen during the 2022 mini-Budget under Prime Minister Liz Truss and Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng. This is a scenario the current Chancellor will be keen to avoid.
2. Austerity
Austerity (spending cuts combined with tax increases) typically dampens demand and slows economic growth. While this approach can help bring inflation down, it is politically unpopular because it reduces household disposable income. It could also result in stagflation, where the people suffer from an economy with negative growth and persistent inflation. In this scenario, consumer-facing sectors such as retail, travel and leisure would likely feel the strain, while industries reliant on government contracts, including construction and industrials, could also suffer.
Financials may face headwinds too, as slower growth and tighter margins reduce lending and investment activity. However, contractionary fiscal policy would generally lower inflation expectations and bond yields, paving the way for potential interest rate cuts over time. Fiscal discipline could support gilt prices, with medium- to longer-dated gilts benefiting most, though volatility tends to be greater the longer the maturity.